Praanggapan Tindak Tutur dalam Persidangan di Kantor Pengadilan Negeri Kota Palu

  • Laode Baisu Universitas Tadulako
Keywords: Presuppositions, speech act, society

Abstract

Presuppositions are studied to determine the intents of a discourse or speech. Presuppositions are assumptions or implicit interferences in certain linguistic expressions. Every conversation always uses levels of communication and implicit or explicit presuppositions or illocutionary. By making the right presuppositions, communicative values expressed in a speech can be quickly understood. The more precise the presuppositions are hypothesized, the higher the value of communication or speech. Conversely, errors in presuppositions affect the speech that may cause uncommunicative coherence. The characteristic of presupposition is something that is assumed by the speakers as the events before generating a speech. The basic characteristic of presupposition is the nature of constancy under negation. It has the intention that the presumption of a statement will remain steady (still true) although the sentence is used as a negative statement or negation. Types of presupposition are: (1) potential presuppositions, (2) factual presuppositions, (3) non-factual presuppositions, (4) lexical presuppositions, (5) structural presuppositions, (6) counterfactual presuppositions.

Author Biography

Laode Baisu, Universitas Tadulako

Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia

References

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
Chaer, Abdul dan Leonie Agustina. 2004. Sosioligustik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Cummings, Louise. 2009. Pragmatik: Sebuah Perspektif Multidipliner.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar
Djajasudarma, T. Fatima. Semantik 1. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Djajasudarma, T. Fatima. Metode Linguistik Ancangan Metode Penelitian. Bandung: Eresco.
Kadekoh, Indrianto. 2012. Panduan Penyusunan dan Penulisan Tesis dan Disertasi. Palu: Universitas Tadulako.
Kushartati, dkk. 2005. Pesona Bahasa: Langkah Awal Memahami Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1994. Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: UI Press.
Levinson. http://dellamandiri.blogspot.cpm/2013 /03/praanggapan pragmatik.html.
Narwoko J. Dwi dan Bagong Suyanto. 2004. Sosiolinguistik Teks Pengantar dan terapan. Surabaya: Karisma Putra Utama Offset.
Rahardi, Kunjana. 2006. Dimensi-Dimensi Kebahasaan. Yogyakarta: Erlangga.
Rani, Abdul, Bustanul Arifim, dan Martutik. 2010. Analisis Wacana: Sebuah Kajian Wacana dalam Pemakaian. Malang: Bayumedia.
Rohmadi, Muhammad. 2004. Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Lingkar Media.
Rokhman, Fathur. 2013. Sosiolinguistik Suatu Pendekatan Pembelajaran dalam Masyarakat Multikultural. Yogyakarta: Ruko Jambusari No. 7A.
Rustono. 1999. Pokok-pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press
Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudyaan Secara Liguistik. Yokyakarta: Duta Wahana University Press.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kuantitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarsono. 2009. Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suyono. 2006. Prgmatik Dasar-Dasar dan Pengajarannya. Malang: Yayasan Asih Asah Asuh.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1986. Pengajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2000. Menulis Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Verhaar, J.W.M. 1999. Azas-Azas Lingistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Wijana, Dewa Putu dan Muhammad Rahmadi. 2010. Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yule, George. 2006. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Published
2024-12-04
How to Cite
BaisuL. (2024). Praanggapan Tindak Tutur dalam Persidangan di Kantor Pengadilan Negeri Kota Palu. Bahasantodea, 3(2), 129-143. Retrieved from http://jurnal.pasca.untad.ac.id/index.php/bahasantodea/article/view/762
Section
Articles